Positive Politeness Strategies in the Ngapak Short Film Ingin Jadi Polisi by Cingire: A Pragmatic Study

Authors

  • Tomi Yahya Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen Author
  • Dwi Heriyanto Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen Author

Keywords:

dialect; Ngapak; politeness theory; positive politeness; pragmatics

Abstract

This study investigates positive politeness strategies employed in the Ngapak-dialect short film Ingin Jadi Polisi (2022) by Cingire, a popular content creator from Kebumen, Central Java, Indonesia. Drawing on Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory, the study applies a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze conversational data derived from the film's transcribed dialogues. Ten utterances were selected through purposive sampling and analyzed according to five dominant positive politeness strategies: in-group identity markers, joking, seeking agreement, giving or asking for reasons, and offering or expressing optimism. The findings reveal that the characters predominantly employ informal address terms, humor, and solidarity-affirming expressions to minimize social distance and reinforce interpersonal bonds. These strategies reflect the culturally embedded communicative values of the Ngapak-speaking community in Kebumen, particularly the norms of directness, egalitarianism, and collective identity. The study contributes to the broader field of pragmatics by offering an empirical analysis of politeness phenomena in Indonesian regional language contexts and underscores the importance of integrating cultural and linguistic perspectives in the study of face-saving behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Cingire. (2022, August 24). Ingin jadi polisi - film pendek ngapak komedi [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-5qJWb5UbI

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Diani, G. (2015). Politeness phenomena in Indonesian: An analysis of positive and negative face strategies. International Journal of Language Studies, 9(2), 45–68.

Geertz, C. (1960). The religion of Java. University of Chicago Press.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Anchor Books.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. Longman.

Keeler, W. (1987). Javanese shadow plays, Javanese selves. Princeton University Press.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Mahsun. (2005). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahapan strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Rahardi, R. K. (2018). Pragmatic phenomena intersection in specific context: A critical review toward some recent linguistics researches in Indonesia. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 377– 384. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4599

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Wedhawati, Nurhayati, E., Setiyanto, E., Marsono, Sukesti, R., Tjatur Wisnu Sasangka, S. S., & Suwadji. (2006). Tata bahasa Jawa mutakhir. Kanisius.

Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Mouton de Gruyter.

Yule, G. (2017). The study of language (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Positive Politeness Strategies in the Ngapak Short Film Ingin Jadi Polisi by Cingire: A Pragmatic Study . (2026). International Teaching For Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) In The 21St Century, 102-107. https://proceedings.umnu.online/index.php/ITSDGs-UMNU/article/view/101

Most read articles by the same author(s)