STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF CRITERION-BASED ASSESSMENT RUBRICS IN WRITING TASKS AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Keywords:
Criterion-Based Assessment Rubric, Students’ Perception, Writing TasksAbstract
Writing is an essential skill in English learning that requires clear guidance and appropriate assessment criteria to support students’ writing development. Therefore, the use of criterion-based assessment rubrics is important to help students understand writing expectations and improve their writing performance. This study aims to investigate students’ perceptions of the use of criterion-based assessment rubrics in writing tasks at SMPN 2 Sumbang. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, consisting of quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire administered to 209 eighth-grade students to examine their cognitive, affective, and behavioral perceptions. Qualitative data were obtained through interviews to support and clarify the questionnaire results. The findings reveal that students’ perceptions of criterion-based assessment rubrics are generally positive. The cognitive aspect shows that 76% of students agree that the rubric helps them understand writing objectives, content, and structure. The affective aspect indicates that 71% of students feel more confident, motivated, and comfortable when using the rubric. Meanwhile, the behavioral aspect demonstrates that 77% of students become more careful and systematic in organizing ideas, applying grammar, and using appropriate punctuation in their writing tasks. Interview results reinforce the survey findings that rubrics help students understand structure and develop ideas, although there was initially some confusion. The results show that the use of criterion-based assessment rubrics plays a significant role in enhancing students’ understanding, motivation, and writing performance. Therefore, English teachers are encouraged to implement clear and detailed assessment rubrics in writing tasks to facilitate better learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
Andrade. (2014). Understanding Rubrics by Heidi Goodrich Andrade. 3, 1–7.
Andrade, H. (2005). Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. College Teaching, 53, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31
Andrade, H., & 2005, Y. D. P. A.-. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/g367-ye94
Barone, D. M., & Taylor, J. M. (2005). Improving Students′ Writing, K-8: From
Meaning-Making to High Stakes! SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5fs3AwAAQBAJ
Brisk, M. (2022). Engaging Students in Academic Literacies: SFL Genre Pedagogy for K-8 Classrooms. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003329275
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-Referenced Language Testing. In Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524803
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods
Research. SAGE Publications.
https://books.google.co.id/books?id=eTwmDwAAQBAJ
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human
Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Hattie, John, & Timperley, Helen. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of
Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Miles, H., & Huberman, A. M. (2020). Saldana.(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. In New York: Sage Publications, Inc.
Mphahlele, L. (2022). Students’ Perception of the Use of a Rubric and Peer Reviews in an Online Learning Environment. Journal of Risk and Financial Management,
15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15110503
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(APR), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9(October), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
Rahman, R. abdul. (2015). Belajar Dan Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineke Cipta. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://adoc.pub/queue/slameto-belajar-dan-faktor-faktor-yangmempengaruhinya-jakar.html
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior. In TA - TT - (9th ed). Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/LK - https://worldcat.org/title/42476044
Sekarini, S., & Marufah, D. W. (2021). Journal of Applied Linguistics. 0316, 52–72.
Walgito, B. (2016). Pengantar Psikologi Umum/Bimo Walgito (IV). ANDI.
Wang, W. (2017). Using rubrics in student self-assessment: student perceptions in the English as a foreign language writing context. Assessment and Evaluation in
Higher Education, 42(8), 1280–1292.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993
Wang, Z., & Chiu, M. M. (2024). Multi-discourse Modes in Student Writing: Effects of Combining Narrative and Argument Discourse Modes on Argumentative
Essay Scores. Applied Linguistics, 45(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac073
Wardhana, I. M. (2017). IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC WRITING
THROUGH RUBRICS AND PEER CORRECTION.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

