An Analysis of English Slang and Abbreviations Used by Students in WhatsApp Communication

Authors

  • Qurotun Amaliah Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen Author
  • Atik Muhimatun Asroriyah Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen Author

Keywords:

abbreviations, language variation, online communication, slang, sociolinguistics

Abstract

In the digital era, online communication through instant messaging applications such as WhatsApp has influenced the way students use language in their daily interactions. One of the emerging phenomena is the use of English slang and abbreviations in online communication. This study aims to analyze the types, functions, and reasons behind the use of English slang and abbreviations by students in WhatsApp communication. This study employed a qualitative descriptive method using a sociolinguistic approach. The data were collected from students’ conversations on WhatsApp through documentation techniques. The collected data were then analyzed based on their types, functions, and reasons for usage. The findings revealed that students used various types of slang and abbreviations, including acronyms, initialisms, shortened forms, slang expressions, and code-mixing. Some examples found in the data were “lol,” “idk,” “brb,” and code-mixing expressions such as “Aku lagi busy lol.” The use of slang and abbreviations serves several functions, including increasing communication efficiency, expressing emotions, creating informal interaction, and strengthening social identity and group solidarity. In addition, their usage is influenced by digital culture, social media trends, and the need for fast communication. This study indicates that English slang and abbreviations have become an important part of students’ communication on WhatsApp and reflect language variation in digital contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antohi, A., & Ciucă, L. (2025). THE IMPACT OF USING NEW TECHNOLOGIES . BALANCING TECHNOLOGIES AND VALUES IN DIGITAL COMMUNICATION. 15(2).

Bahar, A. A., Fauzi, U. A., Febbryani, S., Anwar, A., Istama, N. R., Maulana, A. H., Inggris, P. B., Tangerang, U. M., & Communities, T. (2025). Open Access YOUTH SLANG AS A REFLECTION OF SOCIAL IDENTITY IN TEENAGE. 02(01), 186–194.

Georgieva, M. (2014). INTRODUCING.

Holmes, J. (2022). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics.

Huseynova, R., Aliyeva, N., Habibova, K., & Heydarov, R. (2024). The evolution of the English language in the internet and social media era. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 17(se4), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse4.299-314

Hussain, R., & Zahra, M. (2025). THE IMPACT OF CODE-SWITCHING AND CODE-MIXING ON IDENTITY FORMATION. 8(2), 1133–1144.

Islam, U., Sulthan, N., & Saifuddin, T. (2025). The Influence of Social Media on Changes in Sentence Structure and Word Choice in Urban Youth Language. 2(1), 35–43.

Journal of Translation Studies, D. (2024). Dragoman Journal of Translation Studies. 14(16). https://www.dragoman-journal.org

Rifka Alkhilyatul Ma’rifat, I Made Suraharta, I. I. J. (2024). No Title 済無No Title No Title No Title. 2, 306–312.

Sirodom NILNARONG. (2024). ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH NETSPEAK. 13(April), 1–14.

Stoika, O. (2025). Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences , Associate Professor , Professor at the Foreign Languages Department , Social media and language innovation : a study of slang , abbreviations , and emoticons.

Varnhagen, C. K., McFall, G. P., Pugh, N., Routledge, L., Sumida-MacDonald, H., & Kwong, T. E. (2010). lol: new language and spelling in instant messaging. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9181-y

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

An Analysis of English Slang and Abbreviations Used by Students in WhatsApp Communication. (2026). International Teaching For Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) In The 21St Century, 108-113. https://proceedings.umnu.online/index.php/ITSDGs-UMNU/article/view/102