Redefining Grammar Teaching: Integrating Spoken Grammar into EFL Classrooms
Keywords:
spoken grammar; EFL instruction; communicative competence; discourse-based pedagogy; grammar teachingAbstract
This study explores the integration of spoken grammar into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom as a means to redefine traditional grammar instruction. While grammar teaching in EFL contexts has historically emphasized written, rule-based structures, this approach often fails to prepare learners for natural and authentic spoken interaction. Spoken grammar—characterized by ellipsis, discourse markers, vague expressions, and tag questions—is largely absent from formal curricula, despite its centrality in real-life communication. This qualitative case study investigates how spoken grammar can be pedagogically adapted in EFL instruction and its impact on students’ speaking competence. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with one lecturer and ten students, document analysis, and audio recordings over six weeks of instruction. Thematic analysis revealed that the explicit integration of spoken grammar improved students' fluency, pragmatic awareness, and confidence in oral communication. Students responded positively to tasks involving authentic input and contextualized practice, although some required scaffolding due to unfamiliarity with informal forms. The teacher played a key role in modeling spoken discourse and designing communicative tasks. These findings support the need to redefine grammar pedagogy to better reflect real-world language use, especially in developing EFL contexts like Indonesia. The study offers practical implications for curriculum design, teacher training, and assessment reform, contributing to a more balanced and discourse-informed approach to grammar teaching.
Downloads
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken
and Written English. Longman. DOI: 10.1177/0075424202250290
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English: A Comprehensive Guide —
Spoken and Written English Grammar and Usage. Cambridge University Press.
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674307002535
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
(3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ellis, R. (2006). Researching Form‑Focused Instruction. In Investigating Form‑Focused Instruction
(pp. 1–46). Routledge.
Fatih, M., Fauzi, N., & Norman, E. (2025). Effective Communication in Building Healthy and
Productive Relationships. MES Management Journal.
https://doi.org/10.56709/mesman.v4i1.631.
Kuntso, O. (2024). Applying pragmatic approach in EFL grammar instruction. InterConf.
https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.05.2024.017
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge University Press.
Satori, M. (2024). The Interaction Effects of Language Proficiency and Language Analytic Ability on
Explicit Deductive and Inductive Grammar Instruction. The Journal of AsiaTEFL.
https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2024.21.1.1.1.
Timmis, I. (2005). “Towards a framework for teaching spoken grammar.” ELT Journal, 59(2), 117–
125. DOI: 10.1093/eltj/cci025
Tulu, D., & Gutema, H. (2023). Effect of language use through an integrated skills learners’ speaking
skills: a focus on vocabulary and grammar. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature,
and Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v7i2.8212.
7
Wang, K. (2024). Grammar enhancement in EFL instruction: a reflection on the effects of selfevaluation, teacher support, and L2 grit. BMC Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-
023-01504-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ITSDGs UMNU

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

